bloodiedcorolla
Journal of Mr. E
Say Anything
Once upon a time -- a rain drop no bigger than a tear floated up within the warm upward whirlwind of fate. Up above in this mist of heaven, the little rain drop rose in the rising anticipation of feeling something else. In the essence of the little raindrop, there pulsed a nothing as deep as its diameter and as vibrant and silky from every radial possibility, all for a destiny. All for the hope of one moment making that pulsing nothing into something worth the little raindrop's mass. And as the warm pulling and pushing becomes cold, the heaven's ceiling becomes a biting encompassing movement the core of the little raindrop lets overcome it... freezing from the outside in and becoming an orb of happiness, spreading and expanding under the duress of the chill. Then it begins to fall... to spiral, spin, and plummet down into the abyss of mist below. A snowflake. That's the end of this once upon a time.
101000100111010010010001010
101000100111010010010001010
No Assimilations - Share
The universe is expanding.
Reason?
Dark Energy/Matter has been speeding up the momentum of galaxies and their movement from one another since the big bang.
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/yourHEROICA/image0-2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/yourHEROICA/mypencilisyourdoom/Universe.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
My theory is that before the big bang was a perfect atom.
The perfect atom unleashed itself in less than an instant and spread/expanded beyond the speed of light. The atom became imperfect as all its parts became the building parts of life while remaining in a much slower rate of imitation of the big bang vi sa vi, not beyond the speed of light.
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/yourHEROICA/mypencilisyourdoom/univers2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
The dark energy gives and expands with each ripple. Each ripple is its own entire universe that is each its own version of the perfect atom.
The dark energy/matter acts as a resistance to the ripples and forces itself between existences to overwhelm all else back to the center where the perfect atom was.
| note: explanation for galaxies seeming to spread apart could be the fading process compacting galaxies to better make space for everything in one area.
| side note: We could be experiencing that already.
Discontentment of time: Rate of disintegration happens to be the reason time exists. Disintegration occurs always. In this ink, paper, desk, floor, and this pen; all are working towards not existing. But from glancing at each, you wouldn't be able to tell that each of them are disintegrating. All things, it seems overall, want to become equal with everything else. This means that all matter, molecules, and elements want to end up in an equilibrium with each other.
Time is not singular nor multiplied. What is the same about all disintegration rates is that the rate never ceases. It coincides with energy's constant moment and ability to never be created or destroyed.
In a broader scope, this universe in this current state is the kinetic of a potential that is/was vastly more miniature ie. big bang perfect atom.
Reason for expansion?
Expansion must have a function. Simple Analogy? What expands and retracts? Lung? Balloon? I'll go with lung.
Solution: The universe provides itself with its own energy.
Like a diaphragm... what purpose would it have with a lung-like functioning universe?
OR could it be a perpetuum mobile?
Reasons for it being a perpetuum mobile: Something uses the energy in a way that doesn't deplete or diminish the energy used in the universe. The same amount of energy exists in the perfect atom as the imperfect atom. The thing using the energy could prossibly be providing a model for efficient energy beyond atomic store-houses in quantum mechanics.
Reasons for it not being a perpetuum mobile: The cycle could have a disintegration rate. The thing using the nergy could be part of an even bigger cycle.
If that's a plausible solution-analogy: What is the uber efficient energy? Mental energy?
The perfect atom is stored potential energy. The big bang is the kinetic release and equivalent of the potential. The end of the kinetic burst is the potential of the kinetic pull the universe will use to become the perfect atom again via dark energy. Like a lungs in a baby, they remain pressurized by the diaphragm in the relaxed position and when born, the diaphragm is forced to tense, causing the volume in the chest cavity and decrease and suck in air. So by this analogy, the big bang is a natural inevitability. Natural because of the kinetic from the potential of the womb/perfect atom state.
But is this to say that the womb/perfect atom were specifically made to keep what they carry?
Could there be an even deeper analogy? Something that could explain the potential energy or ideas stored to create the kinetic eruption for a need or purpose for a womb or perfect atom.
Is nothing the opposite and equal to everything here in the universe?
Is nothing the petri-dish in which we as thinking/mental energy exhausting beings exist?
Is nothing the bottle holding the message of everything?
What message is being sent? What does nothing float in? Who will read it when it finally hits the shore of somewhere? Or will it reach nowhere?
In my non-concluding conclusion, my theory of the universe should only inspire inspiration to better enter the unconscious/subconscious/and conscious of those interested in it. Nothing less. Nothing more.
This ends my broadcast day.
Reason?
Dark Energy/Matter has been speeding up the momentum of galaxies and their movement from one another since the big bang.
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/yourHEROICA/image0-2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/yourHEROICA/mypencilisyourdoom/Universe.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
My theory is that before the big bang was a perfect atom.
The perfect atom unleashed itself in less than an instant and spread/expanded beyond the speed of light. The atom became imperfect as all its parts became the building parts of life while remaining in a much slower rate of imitation of the big bang vi sa vi, not beyond the speed of light.
<a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/yourHEROICA/mypencilisyourdoom/univers2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket"></a>
The dark energy gives and expands with each ripple. Each ripple is its own entire universe that is each its own version of the perfect atom.
The dark energy/matter acts as a resistance to the ripples and forces itself between existences to overwhelm all else back to the center where the perfect atom was.
| note: explanation for galaxies seeming to spread apart could be the fading process compacting galaxies to better make space for everything in one area.
| side note: We could be experiencing that already.
Discontentment of time: Rate of disintegration happens to be the reason time exists. Disintegration occurs always. In this ink, paper, desk, floor, and this pen; all are working towards not existing. But from glancing at each, you wouldn't be able to tell that each of them are disintegrating. All things, it seems overall, want to become equal with everything else. This means that all matter, molecules, and elements want to end up in an equilibrium with each other.
Time is not singular nor multiplied. What is the same about all disintegration rates is that the rate never ceases. It coincides with energy's constant moment and ability to never be created or destroyed.
In a broader scope, this universe in this current state is the kinetic of a potential that is/was vastly more miniature ie. big bang perfect atom.
Reason for expansion?
Expansion must have a function. Simple Analogy? What expands and retracts? Lung? Balloon? I'll go with lung.
Solution: The universe provides itself with its own energy.
Like a diaphragm... what purpose would it have with a lung-like functioning universe?
OR could it be a perpetuum mobile?
Reasons for it being a perpetuum mobile: Something uses the energy in a way that doesn't deplete or diminish the energy used in the universe. The same amount of energy exists in the perfect atom as the imperfect atom. The thing using the energy could prossibly be providing a model for efficient energy beyond atomic store-houses in quantum mechanics.
Reasons for it not being a perpetuum mobile: The cycle could have a disintegration rate. The thing using the nergy could be part of an even bigger cycle.
If that's a plausible solution-analogy: What is the uber efficient energy? Mental energy?
The perfect atom is stored potential energy. The big bang is the kinetic release and equivalent of the potential. The end of the kinetic burst is the potential of the kinetic pull the universe will use to become the perfect atom again via dark energy. Like a lungs in a baby, they remain pressurized by the diaphragm in the relaxed position and when born, the diaphragm is forced to tense, causing the volume in the chest cavity and decrease and suck in air. So by this analogy, the big bang is a natural inevitability. Natural because of the kinetic from the potential of the womb/perfect atom state.
But is this to say that the womb/perfect atom were specifically made to keep what they carry?
Could there be an even deeper analogy? Something that could explain the potential energy or ideas stored to create the kinetic eruption for a need or purpose for a womb or perfect atom.
Is nothing the opposite and equal to everything here in the universe?
Is nothing the petri-dish in which we as thinking/mental energy exhausting beings exist?
Is nothing the bottle holding the message of everything?
What message is being sent? What does nothing float in? Who will read it when it finally hits the shore of somewhere? Or will it reach nowhere?
In my non-concluding conclusion, my theory of the universe should only inspire inspiration to better enter the unconscious/subconscious/and conscious of those interested in it. Nothing less. Nothing more.
This ends my broadcast day.
No Assimilations - Share
Transphilosophy
Transphilosophy
There is no value. There is no right and wrong. There are no choices. Ignorance is not an item for ridicule; rather, it is encouragement disguised as learning-stutters. The world is drenched, literally, in points of views unprejudiced to who views them. To not appreciate one point of view as much as another leads to conflict.
Since the beginning of knowledge collecting(learning), there has been a balancing act between the outlook of good and the outlook of evil. They’re both points of view and much of human history is dotted with imbalances between them. The balance between good and evil happens when neither are appreciated more than the other. It is evil when good is more than evil and is also evil when evil is more than good. And good is when good and evil are balanced.
These simple misuses of appreciation between the two have been debated upon on massive scales and on the personal level to dictate what knowledge had merit amongst an infinite array of points of view. For example, the knowledge of iron plus that of fire gave an infinite array of points of view but due to points of view valued more than others, like that of long-lasting imbalances between ancestral countries and over-valued ideals, military knowledge narrowed the possibilities of iron and fire to armor, canons, spears, and swords.
The optimistic point of view could hold claim that if so and so country didn’t raise weapons, our lives now wouldn’t be as they are. That’s so very true. But to think of it this way, Mr. Or Mrs./Miss-optimistic, if imbalances between two countries were resolved and the point of view of peace prevailed, the culmination of steel would have revolutionized the world a whole-lot sooner. Even the light bulb could have been discovered before Columbus came to the Americas. And maybe space travel could have been used to get humans to another part of our galaxy.
But alas, that is just an example. A point of view postponed. By now, you might have forgotten the word Transphilsophy. Rightfully so as all the before-said is merely a part of what makes Transphilosophy beyond philosophy. Philosophy is an outlook containing many points of view. From itself alone, many of those points of view became outlooks on their own. Math was borne from the point of view of logic. Ethics was borne of the point of view gathered from the actions taken by conscious beings. Physical science was borne of the point of view that sustains our need to understand how something works in our environment. Metaphysics was borne of the inward-looking point of view of philosophy that has its own language to describe the abstract meaning of existence and that of reality. Though these four make up the cornerstones of philosophy, the love for knowledge/wisdom has somewhat dwindled between the many points of view and fields of study. A mathematician can theorize, with numbers and models, how far someone falls when in love but cannot describe it. If and when they can, it can be clearly speculated that hey are not a mathematician first but a philosopher always.
Throughout our lives, the appreciating tug-o-war between what to believe as good or bad and what to keep pushes us towards a destiny. And to better understand that destiny is where Transphilosophy comes in.
Imagine a world where there are no boundaries, no hunger, no war, no possessions but that of a sense of community. A world where seeing eye-to-eye means you’ll contemplate till the next conversation so that you might learn something new or teach. If it sounds John Lennon-esque… good. Transphilosophy is, by my definition, the all-encompassing appreciation for philosophy’s many points of view as well as with any other field of study. Now… a background of how Transphilosophy came about.
My answer for Aristotle’s ‘Uncaused Cause’ gave way to concepts of the consciousness. Instead of joining Aristotle and Plato with arguments that an initial cause must exist, I began looking for the initial cause itself. And before I get ahead of myself, it simple started with “What is the meaning of life?” I first considered that all things are alive by the universal observation of exchange between the parts of an atom to be “life” with energy’s movement. And energy is what I considered the action between parts, or what is more easily known as friction. Friction, therefore, by its combining and separating function, vamped my search enough to change the question to “What is the meaning?” and “Why is there meaning?”. The latter question helped me out of being stuck when I studied the periodic table of elements. I noticed that from left to right, elements gained electron shells as they become more stable and noble gases were the most stable; or stable enough to be considered by chemists as inert. From this I gathered that all atoms, within any structure, had the main goal throughout their existence to lose itself indiscriminately with the atoms of other structures to the point where friction, or life, didn’t matter. After a short while of considering universals to better describe this “main goal,” I came up with “assimilation.” And after that I decided that there are two types of assimilation: One is inevitably the complete type where all things reach the inert state and the second being the separation of structures at the whim of friction; also known as incomplete assimilation and is the physically represented world, i.e. lamp, door, vehicle, wall, and “living” things.
But the “Why is there meaning?” came up again. I started thinking about assimilation on a beyond-molecular level to the abstract itself. I was thinking about what really justified or noted separation as the opposite of assimilation. Then it hit me… my thinking this was an assimilation of one thought with another and many others to create or complete the abstract equivalent of the inert state as omniscience. With each though is a point of view eager to assimilate with another. And with the above said question still in mind, the points of view needed sources to be a point of view from whence to be viewed. It implied a multitude of consciousness to house the points of views and from the point of view of the literary device of personification, the analogy of the human consciousness melted away into the universal that all things are conscious. Separation, therefore, is the point of view describing all incomplete assimilations such as: a rock, a building, a cloud, a vehicle, etc,. Incomplete assimilations are structures ‘in medias res’ and are made up of an amount of points of view but not all. A vehicle, for instance, is made up of the points of view of: the wheels, axle system, drive chain, engine, transmission, gear shift, emergency brake, seats, cup holders, dashboard, glove box, display panel, steering wheel, seatbelts, radio, windshields, bumpers, doors, headlights. All of these points of view were drawn to one another by assimilation. Even the point of view of travel means nothing by itself, just like every other point of view in a vehicle. You could think of it this way, you yourself are an incomplete assimilation. But it doesn’t end there. As you read this word to these next few and eventually to this comma, you are assimilating. Your point of view of walking assimilates to the point of view of the floor beneath your feet as it assimilates with the walls, ceiling, and blueprints to the point of view of a shelter. As I’ve mentioned before of outlooks, incomplete assimilations are totality-outlooks when you stop and realize the assimilation. The amount of incomplete assimilations you have govern how you see the world. How you see the world governs how you assimilate; at what rate. And if you see the world with a totality-outlook made up of the points of view of science, you can only appreciate the intricacies of the point of view of the scientific method and the mechanics of how something works as opposed to why it works. To appreciate more than the how it works requires more points of view than just science. When studying the mechanics of a clock, you aren’t just an observer to a mastered set up of cogs and gears, you are a participant. You are a part of what you study: you are not apart from it. This equality created by all things having a consciousness and ultimately a point of view as willing to assimilate as you are is the basis for Transphilosophy. And the basis itself answers the “Why is there meaning?” question.
I look at it this way; all things happen for a reason, have happened for that same reason as they will happen for that same reason and no other reason. We’re here because we’re here and if we weren’t there wouldn’t be a point of view that we aren’t here or theories speculating at the reasons we’re not here as expression wouldn’t be here either. No assimilation. Inert. And since we’re here, we can speculate and theorize at the points of view of what it would be like to not be here.
But the above said paragraph was, in no way, a favoring speech towards nihilism. ^_^ It was however a launch pad for this paragraph on Aristotle’s Uncaused Cause.
Why is there meaning? Thought. The answer to life: thought. The answer to the universe: thought. The answer to everything: thought. Instead of thought meaning a product of mental activity; consider thought to be the infinitely-inert and omnipresent energy. If I were wrong, I wouldn’t be able to write this very sentence in this very notebook with this very pen for you to be able to read it with your very eyes or wouldn’t be able to slowly convince you that all things originated from thought. Besides, it would be literally inhuman to believe me.
Consciousness. One of the many structures created. It alone facilitates thoughts. You, being conscious, could very well deny what I’m suggesting because you yourself cannot fathom what I can seeing as we both are conscious. You could go about your life, smiling on cue, cashing your paycheck; but how long will you go on ignoring the question of why you do any of it? Will you confide in the spiritual messages that you’re alone and that your life is what you make it? Will you look back on your life and only count the happiness?
And to think, the above paragraph is just a thought. There is no value. There is no right or wrong. There are no choices. Ignorance is not an item for ridicule; rather, it is encouragement disguised as learning-stutters. And there it is, Transphilosophy, the all-encompassing appreciation for philosophy’s many points of view as well as with any other field of study. And if you can prove me wrong that all things are not backed by thought or have originated from thought, email me your rebuttal at theworldendsnow@gmail.com.
There is no value. There is no right and wrong. There are no choices. Ignorance is not an item for ridicule; rather, it is encouragement disguised as learning-stutters. The world is drenched, literally, in points of views unprejudiced to who views them. To not appreciate one point of view as much as another leads to conflict.
Since the beginning of knowledge collecting(learning), there has been a balancing act between the outlook of good and the outlook of evil. They’re both points of view and much of human history is dotted with imbalances between them. The balance between good and evil happens when neither are appreciated more than the other. It is evil when good is more than evil and is also evil when evil is more than good. And good is when good and evil are balanced.
These simple misuses of appreciation between the two have been debated upon on massive scales and on the personal level to dictate what knowledge had merit amongst an infinite array of points of view. For example, the knowledge of iron plus that of fire gave an infinite array of points of view but due to points of view valued more than others, like that of long-lasting imbalances between ancestral countries and over-valued ideals, military knowledge narrowed the possibilities of iron and fire to armor, canons, spears, and swords.
The optimistic point of view could hold claim that if so and so country didn’t raise weapons, our lives now wouldn’t be as they are. That’s so very true. But to think of it this way, Mr. Or Mrs./Miss-optimistic, if imbalances between two countries were resolved and the point of view of peace prevailed, the culmination of steel would have revolutionized the world a whole-lot sooner. Even the light bulb could have been discovered before Columbus came to the Americas. And maybe space travel could have been used to get humans to another part of our galaxy.
But alas, that is just an example. A point of view postponed. By now, you might have forgotten the word Transphilsophy. Rightfully so as all the before-said is merely a part of what makes Transphilosophy beyond philosophy. Philosophy is an outlook containing many points of view. From itself alone, many of those points of view became outlooks on their own. Math was borne from the point of view of logic. Ethics was borne of the point of view gathered from the actions taken by conscious beings. Physical science was borne of the point of view that sustains our need to understand how something works in our environment. Metaphysics was borne of the inward-looking point of view of philosophy that has its own language to describe the abstract meaning of existence and that of reality. Though these four make up the cornerstones of philosophy, the love for knowledge/wisdom has somewhat dwindled between the many points of view and fields of study. A mathematician can theorize, with numbers and models, how far someone falls when in love but cannot describe it. If and when they can, it can be clearly speculated that hey are not a mathematician first but a philosopher always.
Throughout our lives, the appreciating tug-o-war between what to believe as good or bad and what to keep pushes us towards a destiny. And to better understand that destiny is where Transphilosophy comes in.
Imagine a world where there are no boundaries, no hunger, no war, no possessions but that of a sense of community. A world where seeing eye-to-eye means you’ll contemplate till the next conversation so that you might learn something new or teach. If it sounds John Lennon-esque… good. Transphilosophy is, by my definition, the all-encompassing appreciation for philosophy’s many points of view as well as with any other field of study. Now… a background of how Transphilosophy came about.
My answer for Aristotle’s ‘Uncaused Cause’ gave way to concepts of the consciousness. Instead of joining Aristotle and Plato with arguments that an initial cause must exist, I began looking for the initial cause itself. And before I get ahead of myself, it simple started with “What is the meaning of life?” I first considered that all things are alive by the universal observation of exchange between the parts of an atom to be “life” with energy’s movement. And energy is what I considered the action between parts, or what is more easily known as friction. Friction, therefore, by its combining and separating function, vamped my search enough to change the question to “What is the meaning?” and “Why is there meaning?”. The latter question helped me out of being stuck when I studied the periodic table of elements. I noticed that from left to right, elements gained electron shells as they become more stable and noble gases were the most stable; or stable enough to be considered by chemists as inert. From this I gathered that all atoms, within any structure, had the main goal throughout their existence to lose itself indiscriminately with the atoms of other structures to the point where friction, or life, didn’t matter. After a short while of considering universals to better describe this “main goal,” I came up with “assimilation.” And after that I decided that there are two types of assimilation: One is inevitably the complete type where all things reach the inert state and the second being the separation of structures at the whim of friction; also known as incomplete assimilation and is the physically represented world, i.e. lamp, door, vehicle, wall, and “living” things.
But the “Why is there meaning?” came up again. I started thinking about assimilation on a beyond-molecular level to the abstract itself. I was thinking about what really justified or noted separation as the opposite of assimilation. Then it hit me… my thinking this was an assimilation of one thought with another and many others to create or complete the abstract equivalent of the inert state as omniscience. With each though is a point of view eager to assimilate with another. And with the above said question still in mind, the points of view needed sources to be a point of view from whence to be viewed. It implied a multitude of consciousness to house the points of views and from the point of view of the literary device of personification, the analogy of the human consciousness melted away into the universal that all things are conscious. Separation, therefore, is the point of view describing all incomplete assimilations such as: a rock, a building, a cloud, a vehicle, etc,. Incomplete assimilations are structures ‘in medias res’ and are made up of an amount of points of view but not all. A vehicle, for instance, is made up of the points of view of: the wheels, axle system, drive chain, engine, transmission, gear shift, emergency brake, seats, cup holders, dashboard, glove box, display panel, steering wheel, seatbelts, radio, windshields, bumpers, doors, headlights. All of these points of view were drawn to one another by assimilation. Even the point of view of travel means nothing by itself, just like every other point of view in a vehicle. You could think of it this way, you yourself are an incomplete assimilation. But it doesn’t end there. As you read this word to these next few and eventually to this comma, you are assimilating. Your point of view of walking assimilates to the point of view of the floor beneath your feet as it assimilates with the walls, ceiling, and blueprints to the point of view of a shelter. As I’ve mentioned before of outlooks, incomplete assimilations are totality-outlooks when you stop and realize the assimilation. The amount of incomplete assimilations you have govern how you see the world. How you see the world governs how you assimilate; at what rate. And if you see the world with a totality-outlook made up of the points of view of science, you can only appreciate the intricacies of the point of view of the scientific method and the mechanics of how something works as opposed to why it works. To appreciate more than the how it works requires more points of view than just science. When studying the mechanics of a clock, you aren’t just an observer to a mastered set up of cogs and gears, you are a participant. You are a part of what you study: you are not apart from it. This equality created by all things having a consciousness and ultimately a point of view as willing to assimilate as you are is the basis for Transphilosophy. And the basis itself answers the “Why is there meaning?” question.
I look at it this way; all things happen for a reason, have happened for that same reason as they will happen for that same reason and no other reason. We’re here because we’re here and if we weren’t there wouldn’t be a point of view that we aren’t here or theories speculating at the reasons we’re not here as expression wouldn’t be here either. No assimilation. Inert. And since we’re here, we can speculate and theorize at the points of view of what it would be like to not be here.
But the above said paragraph was, in no way, a favoring speech towards nihilism. ^_^ It was however a launch pad for this paragraph on Aristotle’s Uncaused Cause.
Why is there meaning? Thought. The answer to life: thought. The answer to the universe: thought. The answer to everything: thought. Instead of thought meaning a product of mental activity; consider thought to be the infinitely-inert and omnipresent energy. If I were wrong, I wouldn’t be able to write this very sentence in this very notebook with this very pen for you to be able to read it with your very eyes or wouldn’t be able to slowly convince you that all things originated from thought. Besides, it would be literally inhuman to believe me.
Consciousness. One of the many structures created. It alone facilitates thoughts. You, being conscious, could very well deny what I’m suggesting because you yourself cannot fathom what I can seeing as we both are conscious. You could go about your life, smiling on cue, cashing your paycheck; but how long will you go on ignoring the question of why you do any of it? Will you confide in the spiritual messages that you’re alone and that your life is what you make it? Will you look back on your life and only count the happiness?
And to think, the above paragraph is just a thought. There is no value. There is no right or wrong. There are no choices. Ignorance is not an item for ridicule; rather, it is encouragement disguised as learning-stutters. And there it is, Transphilosophy, the all-encompassing appreciation for philosophy’s many points of view as well as with any other field of study. And if you can prove me wrong that all things are not backed by thought or have originated from thought, email me your rebuttal at theworldendsnow@gmail.com.
Profile
Calendar
